For the next technical committee call on March 20th, 2018 I’ll be unreachable and off in a jungle (no really). We’re also entering a pretty busy period in releasing our OpenLMIS Ref Distro 3.3.
I’m looking for feedback:
Should we cancel and wait until the next call on Apr 3?
If not, whom would like to host and moderate? Responsibilities include: curating the agenda, being time keeper, taking notes, finding action items, etc.
Thoughts?
I am okay with cancel the call and wait until the next one on Apr 3 but only if there is no any hot topic that have to be presented as soon as possible.
For the next technical committee call on March 20th, 2018 I’ll be unreachable and off in a jungle (no really). We’re also entering a pretty busy period in releasing our OpenLMIS Ref Distro 3.3.
I’m looking for feedback:
Should we cancel and wait until the next call on Apr 3?
If not, whom would like to host and moderate? Responsibilities include: curating the agenda, being time keeper, taking notes, finding action items, etc.
Thoughts?
Best,
Josh
–
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups “OpenLMIS Dev” group.
I am also okay with canceling. Presenting on technical committee usually take some time to prepare and I think we should devote our time to release process.
I am okay with cancel the call and wait until the next one on Apr 3 but only if there is no any hot topic that have to be presented as soon as possible.
For the next technical committee call on March 20th, 2018 I’ll be unreachable and off in a jungle (no really). We’re also entering a pretty busy period in releasing our OpenLMIS Ref Distro 3.3.
I’m looking for feedback:
Should we cancel and wait until the next call on Apr 3?
If not, whom would like to host and moderate? Responsibilities include: curating the agenda, being time keeper, taking notes, finding action items, etc.
Thoughts?
Best,
Josh
–
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups “OpenLMIS Dev” group.
I agree with guys that we should cancel next Tech Committee Call if there is nothing urgent to discuss.
I have a small topic to discuss about returning errors when request has unknown parameters which was mentioned in #help channel lately, but I think it can wait 2 weeks for next meeting so I can prepare a proposed solution.
I am also okay with canceling. Presenting on technical committee usually take some time to prepare and I think we should devote our time to release process.
I am okay with cancel the call and wait until the next one on Apr 3 but only if there is no any hot topic that have to be presented as soon as possible.
For the next technical committee call on March 20th, 2018 I’ll be unreachable and off in a jungle (no really). We’re also entering a pretty busy period in releasing our OpenLMIS Ref Distro 3.3.
I’m looking for feedback:
Should we cancel and wait until the next call on Apr 3?
If not, whom would like to host and moderate? Responsibilities include: curating the agenda, being time keeper, taking notes, finding action items, etc.
Thoughts?
Best,
Josh
–
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups “OpenLMIS Dev” group.
I’ve cancelled the meeting and we’ll reconvene April 3rd.
Best,
Josh
···
On Tuesday, March 13, 2018 at 3:05:48 AM UTC-7, mkwiatkowski wrote:
Hi,
I agree with guys that we should cancel next Tech Committee Call if there is nothing urgent to discuss.
I have a small topic to discuss about returning errors when request has unknown parameters which was mentioned in #help channel lately, but I think it can wait 2 weeks for next meeting so I can prepare a proposed solution.
I am also okay with canceling. Presenting on technical committee usually take some time to prepare and I think we should devote our time to release process.
I am okay with cancel the call and wait until the next one on Apr 3 but only if there is no any hot topic that have to be presented as soon as possible.
For the next technical committee call on March 20th, 2018 I’ll be unreachable and off in a jungle (no really). We’re also entering a pretty busy period in releasing our OpenLMIS Ref Distro 3.3.
I’m looking for feedback:
Should we cancel and wait until the next call on Apr 3?
If not, whom would like to host and moderate? Responsibilities include: curating the agenda, being time keeper, taking notes, finding action items, etc.
Thoughts?
Best,
Josh
–
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups “OpenLMIS Dev” group.